THE DARK SIDE OF WINDFARMS...

Energy is the key word of our times. The world is coming to a turning point: oil is not enough anymore, unless we venture to our last treasured wilderness areas (Alaska and the Amazon) and we are already doing that; carbon will eventually fade too, and most of the processes for producing this energy is just filling the air with contaminants that lead us to these climate changes we are already experiencing.
So if you could support renewable energy sources (wind, water, solar, even nuclear...), why wouldn't you?
The dark truth is that with or without renewable energy sources, everything we do has an impact on environment and for many people it is just too easy to decide between better energy/less pollution and wildlife conservation.
Endless impact studies are done on the sites where the construction of windfarms is planned. But how real is the data that comes out of them? Are the protocols even valid? What amount of energy are people even putting into producing good/acceptable scientific data? And, finally who says what is and what isn't significant data on impacts? How can you decide that? And how can the public get that information and actually decide for itself?
More or less impact is just too relative, isn't it? Because there is always an impact...
For those of you who have never heard about the problems caused by windfarms on birds, here is a list of various information sources:
Article by Marc Duchamp - very informative
Barracuda - spanish newsletter
Country Guardian
Washington Post article - effect of windfarms on bats
Effects of wind turbines on birds - U. Birmingham, report
RSPB on windfarms - the view of the british NGO on windfarms
At the end we just have to wonder how we will ever decide on our energy sources...
While windfarms are growing all over the world, like cornfields, ornithologists, conservationists, environmentalists, and other -ists, are now discussing endlessly and furiously on this subject. And no one seems to have the answer. "Environmental friendly energy" just doesn't seem to be an accurate expression for any of the energy production processes we have created.
The only solution is to trust the good judgement and the knowledge of our scientists on creating new alternatives and also on giving us reliable data on the impact of these alternatives, hopefully with no pressure from the power companies involved. Which I realize is a happy, irrealistic thought...










